If Sarah Palin had any 2016 presidential aspirations, this story might deal a significant deathblow to them.
It begins in Wasilla, Alaska, in late 1998, when a family of four–a single mother and her three daughters–began, according to police reports, receiving untraceable, sexually perverse telephone calls from an unknown man.
Over a period of six weeks, the calls became more frequent, and so the mother requested and received from the telephone company a change of number. The calls stopped for a while, and the family was now able to live in peace.
Until two months later.
That’s when the same man, having finally, somehow, discovered the new phone number, began his phone calls again. But now he dropped from his calls the sexuality and replaced it with threats of violence against the woman and her three children.
This is when Sarah Palin entered the picture.
The mother allegedly (there is no proof) went to Palin’s office to put in a formal request for 24-hour police monitoring of her house.
The request was allegedly denied for some yet unknown reason.
The next month, the family’s home was broken into and all four of them were murdered.
Naturally, this caused heavy unease in Wasilla, and the citizens wanted to hear from Mayor Palin on the matter.
Palin, busy with her re-election campaign, directed all questions to her spokesman, who continually told local reporters that the murder had nothing to do with the harassing phone calls of previous months. “It was just a spontaneous burglary,” said the spokesman, “that culminated, unfortunately, with a murder.”
Murder is a federal issue, of course, so, several months later, Sarah Palin herself was questioned before Congress on what exactly transpired with regard to the stalker, the family of four, and their murder. (If you were up until this point unaware of these congressional hearings, that can be attributed to Palin’s not being a major figure in politics at that time.)
Under oath, Palin claimed that no security of any kind was ever requested. At one point, the strain of being questioned having evidently taken its toll on her, she attempted to deflect the questioning and suggested it doesn’t matter who is to blame. “What difference, at this point, does it make?” she erupted indignantly.
The questions ultimately ceased, both by Congress and by the news media, who were content with not knowing the answers.
But now a white paper of the mother’s formal request of that 24-hour police monitoring has been released, along with the formal denial of that request. The damning revelation: Sarah Palin’s signature is on that denial.
This is proof–not evidence, but proof–that Sarah Palin, Mayor of Wasilla, was requested security; that Sarah Palin, Mayor of Wasilla, did deny that security, which resulted in the deaths of four women and children; that Sarah Palin, Mayor of Wasilla, committed the crime of perjury before Congress; and that Sarah Palin, private citizen and potential 2016 Republican presidential candidate, can kiss any political future goodbye and start preparing to live the rest of her days in an 8-by-10 prison cell.
That is, if the media cares enough to report on this atrocity.
I assume you have now figured out what this post is really about. For the record, all the claims made about Sarah Palin in this post are fictional and written for satirical purposes. The post is really about Hillary Clinton and the Benghazi scandal. If Sarah Palin or any Conservative had done anything remotely similar to this they would have been crucified by the media.
Anonymous says
U had me going for a while.
thewriteamericaTheWriteAmerica says
You do realize that Liberal web sites will begin quoting bits of this out-of-context, don’t you? The first one will not link to you. Then all subsequent ones will link to the first one that quoted you out of context. It will fireball across the web until it is finally shown as false. But none of the sites that quoted it will post a retraction. Like “I can see Russia from my front porch” it will be attributed to Palin, and not to the actress that really said it.