For years, Americans were told that questioning Georgia’s 2020 election was itself a threat to democracy. But history has a way of complicating simple narratives.
The official result remains unchanged — thus far. Joe Biden carried Georgia by the slimmest margin; 11,779 votes. Yet, the story does not end there.
In the years since the election, investigators, auditors, journalists, courts, and election officials have continued uncovering procedural failures, recordkeeping problems, audit discrepancies, misplaced documentation, and other irregularities that raise a legitimate question: Was Donald Trump wrong to demand a closer look?
That question matters because one of the most famous moments of the post-election controversy became the basis for enormous legal and political attacks against Trump. During his January 2021 call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, Trump asked officials to “find” 11,780 votes. Critics portrayed the statement as an attempt to manufacture votes. Find and manufacture are very different things.
Trump and his supporters argued that they believed legitimate votes had been overlooked, miscounted, or improperly handled, and that a thorough review would reveal enough errors to change the outcome.
Subsequent events make that argument harder to dismiss than many in the media originally suggested. During Georgia’s recount process, officials discovered nearly 6,000 ballots that had not been included in the original count because of reporting and scanning failures. Thousands of those votes favored Trump.
The discovery demonstrated something important: Missing votes were not a conspiracy theory. They existed.
Additional reviews later identified audit mistakes and tabulation discrepancies in Fulton County. State investigators found thousands of audit-related errors that should never have occurred in an election decided by fewer than 12,000 votes.
Again, officials maintained the mistakes were not large enough to alter the certified outcome. But they were mistakes nonetheless. Significant mistakes.
Then came further revelations. Fulton County officials acknowledged problems involving unsigned tabulator tapes and election documentation that should have been properly preserved and verified.
Questions surrounding election records continued years after the race had supposedly been settled. The credibility of the Georgia prosecution itself has suffered significant damage. Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis became the subject of intense scrutiny after it was revealed that she had a romantic relationship with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, whom she had hired to help lead the case against Trump. Courts ultimately disqualified Willis from continuing to prosecute the case unless Wade resigned, and subsequent legal battles, appeals, and ethics investigations have further delayed proceedings. What was once portrayed as one of the strongest cases against Trump has become mired in questions about prosecutorial misconduct, conflicts of interest, and whether political considerations played too large a role in one of the most consequential prosecutions in modern American history.
Most recently, federal investigators obtained election-related records and materials from Fulton County as part of an ongoing investigation. Fulton County Democrats fought the feds in court, and the court found in the fed’s favor. The legal battles surrounding those records continue.
Perhaps those investigations will ultimately reveal nothing significant. Perhaps they will reveal serious misconduct. There are indications of elections fraud. However, at this point, nobody knows the ultimate outcome of the federal investigation.
What Americans do know is that confidence in elections depends on transparency. Georgia has not been tranparent.
When elections are extraordinarily close, scrutiny should not be feared. It should be welcomed.
That is why many Americans view the legal campaign against President Trump in Georgia with increasing skepticism. The central question is not whether every claim made after the election turned out to be correct. The question is whether asking for a full accounting of ballots, records, audits, and procedures in a race decided by 11,779 votes should be treated as criminal conduct.
Reasonable people can disagree about Trump’s conclusions. But it is becoming increasingly difficult to argue that there were no legitimate issues worthy of investigation.
The more that election officials acknowledge missing ballots, flawed audits, misplaced records, and procedural failures, the more many Americans wonder whether the response should have been greater transparency rather than criminal prosecution.
A healthy republic does not fear questions. It answers them. And four years later, Georgia still has questions that many citizens believe deserve answers.
Leave a Reply